ARTICLE

Timber Construction Materials in Modern Timber Buildings: Domestic and Global Market Trends

Je-Gwan Joung1https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9440-6032, Dong-Hyun Kwon1https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6568-9693, Hyeon-Ju Im1https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5224-9990, Hye-In Lee1https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4826-9105, Ho-Jeong Cho1https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4196-8036, Sung-Jun Pang1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3670-3421
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea
*Corresponding author : Sung-Jun Pang, Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea, Tel : +82-62-530-2094 E-mail : sjp@jnu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2024, Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Chonnam National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 29, 2024 ; Revised: Dec 11, 2024 ; Accepted: Dec 23, 2024

Published Online: Dec 31, 2024

Abstract

This study aims to analyze domestic and global market trends in timber construction from the perspective of timber building materials to assess the status of the domestic timber building industry infrastructure. The research methodology involved a comprehensive literature review and a market survey through interviews with industry professionals. The materials used in each part of a timber building, as well as the infrastructure of the timber construction industry, were investigated and reorganized from a material perspective. Key structural components such as roofs, connections, walls, floors, and foundations were studied, and the materials were summarized accordingly. The results highlight that timber construction materials, such as cross-laminated timber and laminated veneer lumber, are lightweight and flexible, allowing for shallow foundations and effective vibration absorption, which distinguishes them from reinforced concrete and steel structures. Despite the low self-sufficiency rate in wood and the lack of production infrastructure, domestic manufacturers in Korea have the technology to produce high-quality wood products using local timber. The recent removal of height restrictions on wood buildings has created opportunities for mid-rise and high-rise timber construction in cities, which is expected to boost demand for high-performance wood products and potentially lead to growth in the domestic timber construction market. These findings can contribute to the development of sustainable timber building solutions and promote the expansion of timber use in construction, supporting carbon neutrality goals.

Keywords: timber; materials; building; construction; trends

Introduction

Timber is a natural resource that stores carbon, and it can minimize carbon emissions during the construction process [1-7]. Timber absorbs carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during its growth process and stores carbon, thereby fixing carbon in buildings for a long time even after harvesting [8-11]. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) also recognizes timber and post-harvest timber products (HWP) as carbon storage, and continuous use of timber is evaluated as a way to promote the regeneration of forest resources and form a virtuous carbon cycle system [12,13].

Overseas, timber construction, which combines new technologies and engineering approaches, is emerging as a sustainable construction solution in modern urban environments [14-20]. Modern timber architecture is attracting attention because of the eco-friendliness of timber as a sustainable building material and the possibility of achieving carbon neutrality [21,22]. Buildings constructed with timber materials have significantly lower carbon emissions during the production and construction process compared to other building materials such as reinforced concrete or steel, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of the entire construction process [23-33]. Several countries, including Canada and Japan, are operating laws and campaigns to encourage the use of timber with the goal of achieving carbon neutrality, and these policies are contributing to the expansion of jobs related to the timber industry [34-38].

In Korea, the expansion of timber construction is also emerging as an important task. The government is promoting the use of timber in public facilities and buildings to achieve the 2050 carbon neutrality goal [39,40]. The Korea Forest Service announced that it is supporting the development of public and private buildings using local timber and discussing laws and guidelines to encourage the preferential use of timber in public buildings [41]. However, Korea has a low self-sufficiency rate of about 16% for timber and is highly dependent on timber imports [42]. In addition, there is a lack of infrastructure for production and processing of timber for building structures. These problems are acting as factors that hinder the growth of the overall timber construction industry [43].

In this study, the domestic and global market trends of timber construction were analyzed from the perspective of timber building materials to understand the status of the domestic timber building industry infrastructure. By understanding the status of the domestic timber building industry infrastructure, we can clearly identify problems and areas in the material supply process that need improvement. This will provide basic data for policy decisions and establishment of industry activation strategies, contributing to increasing the efficiency of the timber supply chain.

Materials and Methods

Fig. 1 shows the research methodology of this study. The materials used in each part of the wooden building, as well as the infrastructure of the wooden building industry, were investigated. In addition, the infrastructure was reorganized from the perspective of materials. The materials and market trends for each part of the wooden building were organized based on a literature review, and a market survey was conducted through interviews with industry professionals.

tals-62-0-13-g1
Fig. 1. Research methodology and progress overview of this study.
Download Original Figure

Fig. 2 shows a virtual timber building designed to illustrate both the exterior and interior of a timber structure. The five sections, roof, connections, wall, floor, foundation, represent the primary structural components of timber buildings. The timber building materials used in these main structural parts were investigated and categorized by material type.

tals-62-0-13-g2
Fig. 2. Conceptual image of modern timber building designed with artificial intelligence (AI). (a) External appearance, (b) internal appearance.
Download Original Figure

Timber buildings may include structural members such as columns, beams, and trusses, and the structural system can vary based on the arrangement and use of these members. In other words, the same materials may be used for different components, and components may vary depending on the structural system. However, by investigating the five components in Fig. 2, all the components forming the external boundaries (roof, external walls, foundation) and internal boundaries (floor, internal walls, joints) of the timber structure can be reviewed. All the materials of the timber building can be summarized and the overlapping materials can be classified based on the corresponding components.

Results and Discussion

1. Comparison of materials in timber, concrete, and steel structures

In this study, the main materials used in each major part of the timber structure were analyzed to clarify their characteristics by comparing them with the materials used in reinforced concrete and steel structures. Table 1 summarizes the main materials used in the foundations of timber structures and compares them with those used in reinforced concrete and steel structures. The important factors for each structure are as follows: In timber structures, the foundation requires a waterproofing membrane and moisture management [44]. In reinforced concrete structures, the foundation requires crack management to support the heavy structure [45]. In steel structures, the foundation requires corrosion protection and stable connection through anchor plates. While timber structures use lightweight and shallow foundations, reinforced concrete and steel structures require deeper and stronger foundations due to their heavier loads [46,47]. Each type of foundation has its advantages and is selected based on the building requirements, site conditions, and construction budget.

Table 1. Comparison of foundations in timber, reinforced concrete, and steel structures
Structure type Timber structure Reinforced concrete structure Steel structure
Foundation materials Concrete+waterproof membrane, anchor bolts Reinforcement bars+concrete Reinforced concrete+anchor plates, bolts
Primary foundation type Strip foundation, pad foundation Mat foundation, pile foundation Mat foundation, pile foundation, pad foundation
Load distribution Light structure allows for shallow foundations Heavy loads require deep and strong foundations Strong vertical load distribution through pile foundations
Foundation cost Low cost (shallow foundations possible) Medium cost (use of rebar and concrete) High cost (requires pile foundations and anchor plates)
Seismic performance Flexible, good seismic performance Heavy structure, more prone to seismic shock High elasticity, excellent seismic performance
Construction speed Fast construction possible Requires curing time for concrete Quick construction with prefabricated foundations
Waterproofing & durability Vulnerable to moisture, requires waterproofing Resistant to moisture but prone to cracking Requires anti-corrosion treatment for durability
Download Excel Table

Table 2 summarizes the main materials used in the floors of timber structures and compares them with those used in reinforced concrete and steel structures. Recently, hybrid structures that take into account the advantages of each material are also being used, and the selection of flooring materials varies depending on the building’s purpose, budget, and environmental conditions [48-50]. Timber floors are lightweight and require moisture management [51-53]. Timber has a natural insulating function, but if higher insulation performance is required, additional insulation is required [54]. Timber floors must be reinforced with fireproof gypsum board or fire retardant treatment for fire resistance [55]. Timber is environmentally friendly and reusable, but is vulnerable to moisture and insects [56].

Table 2. Comparison of floors in timber, reinforced concrete, and steel structures
Structure type Timber structure Reinforced concrete structure Steel structure
Primary materials Solid timber, cross-laminated timber (CLT), plywood, oriented strand board (OSB) Reinforced concrete slab (concrete+rebar) Steel decking with concrete topping, composite slabs
Weight Lightweight Very heavy, requires strong support Lighter than concrete but heavier than timber when combined with concrete
Structural performance Good flexibility, absorbs vibrations Excellent compressive strength, limited flexibility High strength and elasticity, good for large spans
Acoustic performance Moderate sound absorption, may require additional layers Good soundproofing but can cause impact noise Can transmit noise, needs acoustic insulation
Fire resistance Requires fire-retardant treatment Naturally fire-resistant due to concrete mass Requires fireproofing coatings or sprays
Construction speed Quick installation, prefabricated panels Slower due to curing time of concrete Fast with prefabricated steel components
Environmental impact Low carbon footprint, renewable material High carbon emissions during production Moderate carbon emissions, recyclable material
Durability & maintenance Requires maintenance (moisture, insects) Long-lasting, minimal maintenance Durable but prone to corrosion, requires maintenance
Download Excel Table

Reinforced concrete floors are heavy and require strong supports. Although they have excellent soundproofing performance, most concrete apartments in Korea still have problems with inter-floor noise. Steel structure floors are strong and lightweight structures and are used in high-rise buildings and commercial buildings. They have a high possibility of noise transmission, so additional soundproofing materials are required. Steel structures are vulnerable to fire and require fireproofing treatment [57,58]. Steel structures can be recycled, but corrosion management is required [59]. Concrete floors have high carbon emissions and require curing time, but timber floors and steel floors can be constructed quickly using prefabricated components [60,61].

Table 3 summarizes the main materials used in the exterior and interior walls of timber structures and compares them with those used in reinforced concrete and steel structures. Exterior and interior walls have many overlapping items, and most of the contents in Table 3 apply to both exterior and interior walls. Exterior wall materials are required because the wall receives loads and is in contact with the outside, and interior wall materials may also be required for exterior walls in some cases.

Table 3. Comparison of walls in timber, reinforced concrete, and steel structures
Structure type Timber structure Reinforced concrete structure Steel structure
Exterior wall materials Timber siding, plywood oriented strand board (OSB), cross-laminated timber (CLT), moisture barrier Reinforced concrete, cement board, stone veneer Steel panels, aluminum cladding, glass curtain walls
Interior wall materials Timber panels, gypsum board, plywood Reinforced concrete walls, gypsum board Metal studs+gypsum board, glass partitions
Weight Lightweight Heavy, requires strong support Medium to lightweight with metal panels
Thermal performance Excellent natural insulation Poor, requires additional insulation Moderate, often requires extra insulation
Moisture & waterproofing Susceptible to moisture and pests, requires waterproofing Resistant to moisture but prone to cracking Requires anti-corrosion treatment
Fire resistance Requires fire-retardant treatment Excellent fire resistance Needs fireproof coatings or sprays
Construction speed Fast with prefabricated panels Slow due to concrete curing time Fast with prefabricated components
Environmental impact Eco-friendly, renewable material High carbon emissions during concrete production Moderate carbon footprint, recyclable material
Maintenance Requires regular maintenance (moisture, pests) Low maintenance, highly durable Requires corrosion protection and fireproofing
Download Excel Table

Timber structure exterior walls are light and quick to construct; however, timber is vulnerable to moisture and water, necessitating the installation of a moisture barrier [62,63]. Gypsum board and insulation must be added to timber interior walls to reinforce fire resistance and thermal performance. Timber walls are vulnerable to fire, so fireproofing is required [64].

Concrete exterior walls are durable and have excellent soundproofing performance, but they are heavy and require a curing period, making construction time-consuming [65]. Concrete interior walls are structurally sound and have good soundproofing; however, they can generate impact noise [66]. Additionally, concrete walls have excellent fire resistance and durability, but crack management is important, and carbon emissions are high.

Steel frame exterior walls are made of metal panels and glass, making them lightweight and suitable for high-rise buildings. Steel frame interior walls, made of a combination of metal studs and drywall, are lightweight and quick to construct; however, they require additional soundproofing. The metal in steel frame walls is recyclable, but regular maintenance is needed to prevent corrosion and fire, which can be expensive.

Table 4 summarizes the main materials used in the connections of timber structures and compares them with those used in reinforced concrete and steel structures. Connection materials vary depending on the building’s intended use, load requirements, and environmental conditions. In timber construction, nails, screws, bolts, steel plates, and adhesives are primarily used for connections between members. Because these materials are mechanically connected, they provide flexibility and are effective at absorbing vibrations. However, they are vulnerable to moisture and corrosion. Thus, corrosion prevention and regular inspections are necessary.

Table 4. Comparison of connections in timber, reinforced concrete, and steel structures
Structure type Timber structure Reinforced concrete structure Steel structure
Primary connection materials Metal fasteners (nails, screws, bolts), steel plates, adhesives Reinforcement bars, concrete (rebar embedded joints) Bolts, welding, anchor plates, brackets
Type of connections Mechanical joints (nails, bolts), mortise and tenon, adhesive bonding Monolithic connections (concrete and rebar bonded) Bolted or welded connections, prefabricated joints
Strength & performance Flexible connections, absorbs vibrations Rigid and strong, suitable for heavy loads High strength, excellent for tensile and shear loads
Fire resistance Requires fireproofing treatments High fire resistance Requires fireproof coatings
Corrosion resistance Metal fasteners prone to corrosion, requires treatment Resistant to corrosion due to concrete cover Requires anti-corrosion treatments
Construction speed Quick with mechanical fasteners and adhesives Slow due to curing of concrete Fast with prefabricated joints and welding
Environmental impact Eco-friendly, lower emissions, but fasteners may corrode High carbon footprint due to concrete production Moderate carbon emissions, recyclable components
Maintenance requirements Requires regular inspection of fasteners and joints Minimal maintenance Requires inspection for corrosion and welding quality
Download Excel Table

In reinforced concrete structures, strong connections are formed by combining concrete with embedded steel bars [67]. The connections can support large loads, making them suitable for large and heavy structures. However, they lack flexibility and require ongoing crack management.

In steel structures, connections are typically designed using bolts, welding, anchor plates, and brackets. They have strong resistance to tensile and shear loads and can be constructed rapidly with prefabricated components. Maintenance is required to prevent corrosion and fire damage, and regular inspections are necessary to ensure weld quality.

Table 5 summarizes the main materials used in the roofs of timber structures and compares them with those used in reinforced concrete and steel structures. Timber and steel roofs can be constructed quickly with the use of prefabricated components. Concrete roofs require curing, so construction time is longer. Timber is the most environmentally friendly, while concrete has a high carbon footprint, and steel is recyclable but requires corrosion management [68].

Table 5. Comparison of roofs in timber, reinforced concrete, and steel structures
Aspect Timber structure Reinforced concrete structure Steel structure
Primary roofing materials Timber shingles, asphalt shingles, cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels, timber rafters Concrete slabs, precast concrete panels Steel sheets, metal roofing panels, corrugated steel
Weight Lightweight Very heavy, requires strong structural support Moderate weight, lighter than concrete but heavier than timber
Thermal insulation Good natural insulation Low insulation, additional layers required Moderate insulation, often requires extra insulation
Fire resistance Requires fire-retardant treatment Excellent fire resistance Requires fireproof coatings
Moisture resistance Prone to moisture damage, requires waterproofing Naturally resistant to water but prone to cracks Good moisture resistance but prone to corrosion
Durability Requires regular maintenance Highly durable with minimal maintenance Durable but requires corrosion protection
Construction speed Fast with prefabricated components Slow due to concrete curing time Fast with prefabricated steel sheets
Environmental impact Eco-friendly, renewable material High carbon emissions during concrete production Moderate carbon footprint, recyclable material
Maintenance Requires regular inspection and treatment for moisture Minimal maintenance Requires regular corrosion and coating checks
Download Excel Table

Timber roofs are suitable for housing because of their light weight and natural insulation, and they are also used for large building roof structures, such as gymnasiums, auditoriums, train stations, and airports, because of their excellent strength-to-weight ratio. Timber roofs can be constructed quickly, but require regular moisture management.

Concrete roofs are suitable for commercial buildings and infrastructure due to their durability and fire resistance. However, they require inspection to prevent cracks, and insulation reinforcement is needed because of their poor insulating properties. Steel roofs are suitable for industrial facilities and high-rise buildings. They can be constructed quickly, but require corrosion protection and fire management. Fireproof coating is essential.

2. Material infrastructure for timber construction

Table 6 reorganizes the contents of Tables 1 through 5 by material and adds information major manufacturers. It categorizes wood-based and non-wood-based materials, summarizing the components used in timber construction and their major manufacturers. This table clearly shows the corresponding components by material, facilitating efficient procurement.

Table 6. Main materials and manufacturers for timber construction
Category Material Application Manufacturer
Domestic Overseas
Wood-based materials Cross-laminated timber (CLT) Floor, walls, roof KMbeam [69], Huin [70], HCwood [71], SYwood [72], DHwood [73], National Forestry Cooperatives Federation [NFCF] [74] Stora Enso [86], Binderholz [87], KLH [88]
Glue laminated timber (Glulam) Structural column & beams, roof KMbeam [69], Huin [70], HCwood [71], SYwood [72], DHwood [73], National Forestry Cooperatives Federation [NFCF] [74] Hasslacher Norica Timber [89]
Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) Structural beams, floor, walls, roof None Boise Cascade [90], Carter Holt Harvey [91], Weyerhaeuser [92]
Oriented strand board (OSB) Walls, floor, roof None Norbord (West Fraser) [93], Kronospan [94], Egger [95]
Plywood Walls, floor, roof Sungchang Enterprise [75], Sun&L [76], Eagon Industrial [77] UPM Plywood [96], Greenply [97], Georgia-Pacific [98]
Particleboard Walls, floor, roof Dongwha [78] Egger [95], Sonae Arauco [99], Swiss Krono [100]
Solid timber (studs, joists, rafters) Wall, floor, roof 1,149 companies [79] Too many to enumerate
Non-wood-based materials Concrete Foundation Namyang Construction [80], Daehan Materials [81] Holcim [101], CEMEX [102], HeidelbergCement [103]
Waterproof membrane Foundation, wall, roof KCC [82], Hyundai Construction [83] Sika [104], GCP Applied Technologies [105], Carlisle [106]
Steel plate Connections Megatie [84] Rothoblaas [107], Simpson Strong-Tie [108], Nippon Steel [109]
Metal fasteners Connections Megatie [84] Rothoblaas [107], Simpson Strong-Tie [108], Hilti [110], Sherpa [111]
Gypsum board Walls, floor KCC [82], LG Hausys [85] USG [112]
Adhesives Connections and structural reinforcement None for structural timber Henkel [113], 3M [114], Sika [104]
Insulation materials Walls, floor, roof KCC [82], LG Hausys [85] Rockwool [115], Owens Corning [116], Knauf Insulation [117] , CTBUH [118]
Download Excel Table

Wood-based materials such as cross-laminated timber (CLT), glued-laminated timber (GLT), laminated veneer lumber (LVL), oriented strand board (OSB), and particle board are used for structural elements like floors, walls, and roofs (Fig. 3). These materials are well-suited for modern timber construction due to their excellent structural performance and environmental sustainability (Fig. 4). CLT is used in mid- and high-rise timber buildings, and in Korea, domestic companies such as Kyungmin Industries (kmbeam), Huin, and National Forestry Cooperatives Federation (NFCF) produce it. Globally, companies like Stora Enso and KLH, which use automated production systems, supply CLT to the international market. In contrast, domestic manufacturers use semi-automated systems and produce based on orders. Although their production volumes are smaller compared to automated overseas manufacturers, domestic manufacturers have the technology to produce structural CLT using local wood, allowing for customized production that meets consumer specifications and quality requirements.

tals-62-0-13-g3
Fig. 3. Representative structural elements: cross-laminated timber (CLT) and glued-laminated timber (GLT).
Download Original Figure
tals-62-0-13-g4
Fig. 4. Modern Timber Building with CLT and GLT [119]. CLT, cross-laminated timber; GLT, glued-laminated timber.
Download Original Figure

Domestic CLT manufacturers typically also undertake construction. CLT and structural laminated lumber are used for key structural components and roofs, with six manufacturers currently operating in Korea. These manufacturers use facilities originally designed for laminated lumber or plywood, allowing them to produce CLT panels without length restrictions. However, the panel width is limited to less than 1.2 m. Initially, resorcinol adhesives were commonly used, but there is now a trend toward eco-friendly PUR or isocyanate adhesives, which do not contain formaldehyde (Table 7).

Table 7. Production capabilities and specifications of CLT manufacturers in Korea
Manufacturer Maximum width (m) Maximum length (m) Adhesive Processing equipment Production volume (estimated) (m3/year)
A 1.2 5 PUR Outsource 10.8 m3
[(1.2×5×0.15)×12]
B 1.2 6 Resorcinol Outsource 13.0 m3
[(1.2×6×0.15)×12]
C 1.2 4.3 Resorcinol Outsource 9.3 m3
[(1.2×4.3×0.15)×12]
D 3 10 PUR, resorcinol Equipped 54 m3
[(0.9×6×0.15)×12]
E 1.2 2.4 PUR, resorcinol Equipped 5.2 m3
[(1.2×2.4×0.15)×12]
F 2.6 7.5 PUR Equipped 35.1 m3
[(1.2×2.4×0.15)×12]

CLT, cross-laminated timber; PUR, polyurethane.

Download Excel Table

Representative non-wood-based materials include concrete, steel plates, and insulation, which enhance structural stability and energy efficiency. In timber construction, timber members are generally connected using steel products. In other countries, various steel connectors for timber have been developed and commercialized. In Korea, companies like POSCO, Hyundai Steel, and Dongkuk Steel lead the global steel industry, indicating the potential for Korea to lead the global market for timber construction connection hardware through research and technological advancements.

Gypsum board and insulation are used to ensure fire resistance and thermal performance in interior walls and floors. Global manufacturers such as KCC, LG Hausys, and Eagon Industrial are based in Korea. Adhesives also play a crucial role in reinforcing connections and assembling structures. Korea’s petrochemical industry, a core sector of the national economy, is highly competitive both regionally and globally. This advantage enhances the competitiveness of domestic modern timber construction and its potential for growth into a new industry.

3. Domestic and global market trends in timber building construction

Fig. 5 shows the number of buildings under construction and the total floor area of timber buildings in South Korea over the past 20 years. The blue bar represents the number of buildings under construction, which increased over time, peaked in 2016, and then declined. Since 2019, approximately 10,000 units have been constructed annually. The orange line depicts the total floor area of timber buildings, which followed a similar trend. It increased until 2016, then declined, and has remained steady at around 1 million m2 since 2019. Currently, most of the domestic wooden building market consists of single-family houses, and overall market growth has stagnated. Therefore, there is a need to create new markets to expand timber building construction and boost timber consumption.

tals-62-0-13-g5
Fig. 5. Trends in the number and floor area of timber buildings in Korea. Source: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport [120].
Download Original Figure

The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat 64118 provides the data for timber buildings over 8 stories tall, built worldwide since 2008. Fig. 6 summarizes images of representative high-rise timber buildings and key information about them. HoHo Timber is an 84-meter-tall, 24-story timber tower located in Vienna, Austria. Completed in 2019, it is a symbolic example of the potential of timber construction.

tals-62-0-13-g6
Fig. 6. Examples of High-Rise Timber Buildings. Source: Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat [118].
Download Original Figure

Ascent MKE is an 86.6-meter-tall, 25-story building located in Milwaukee, USA, which was completed in 2023. Currently the tallest timber building, it is another example of the advancement of modern timber construction technology, demonstrating the potential of timber buildings, especially in North America.

Atlassian’s Tower is a 180-meter-tall, 40-story building currently under construction in Sydney, Australia. This building is a supertall structure that uses timber as its primary material and is expected to be one of the tallest timber buildings in the world when completed.

W350 Sumitomo is a 350-meter-tall, 70-story timber building planned for Tokyo, Japan. Still in the planning stages, this building is expected to be the world’s tallest timber structure when completed and will set a new standard for eco-friendly construction by maximizing the use of wood.

Fig. 7 is a graph visualizing the change in the number of timber buildings over 8 stories tall and their maximum height, built worldwide since 2008. The blue bars represent the number of buildings by year, and the orange line represents the maximum height of timber buildings built during that period. The number of timber buildings over 8 stories has increased over time, and their height has also increased.

tals-62-0-13-g7
Fig. 7. Trends in the number and height of timber buildings in the world. Source: Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat [118].
Download Original Figure

Several researchers have investigated the timber construction and wood products market. Albee (2019) reported that the adoption of CLT in commercial and industrial construction is increasing in North America and Europe. In North America, the use of CLT is expanding in public libraries, university housing, and similar projects. As a result, the global CLT market size is expected to more than double from $664 million in 2018 to $1.457 billion in 2024.

Nepal et al. (2021) also noted that regulations on timber construction are being relaxed in North America, leading to increased use of CLT in large public buildings and high-rise buildings. Specifically, the demand for large wood products such as CLT is rising, with a global production volume of 2.8 million m3 recorded in 2020. The CLT market is projected to grow continuously from 2021 to 2027 at a compound annual growth rate of 12%–14%.

In Korea, the regulation limiting the roof height of timber buildings to 18 meters was removed in November 2020 as part of the revisions to structural standards for buildings. This change makes it possible to construct mid-rise timber buildings in cities, enhancing their competitiveness. If mid-rise timber buildings become more common in cities, the currently stagnant timber building market, as shown in Fig. 5, is expected to grow again. Demand for high-performance wood products such as CLT and timber building materials will also increase. Timber buildings provide a means of long-term carbon storage and will contribute to achieving carbon neutrality in the construction industry.

Conclusion

  1. Timber construction materials and timber structures are lightweight, allowing for shallow foundations, and have the flexibility to effectively absorb vibrations. Timber construction materials such as CLT and LVL offer excellent structural performance, faster construction speed, and a lower carbon footprint, making them environmentally friendly. In contrast, reinforced concrete and steel structures require heavier and stronger foundations but provide greater durability and fire resistance.

  2. Analysis of the infrastructure for timber building materials shows that Korea has a low self-sufficiency rate in wood and lacks infrastructure, but domestic manufacturers have the technology to produce high-quality wood products using domestic wood. Semi-automatic systems enable customized production to meet consumer needs.

  3. The domestic timber construction market in Korea has primarily consisted of single-family homes and has remained stagnant since 2016, with an annual market size of about 10,000 units. However, the recent removal of height restrictions on timber buildings has created opportunities for mid-rise and high-rise timber construction in urban areas. This regulatory change is expected to boost demand for high-performance wood products like CLT, potentially revitalizing the domestic timber construction market and fostering growth in the wood industry.

  4. This study focuses on the material and infrastructure aspects of timber construction. Future research should explore the carbon storage and offset effects of timber construction, its contribution to carbon neutrality, and its socio-economic and policy implications. Advanced manufacturing technologies, such as automated production lines, should also be developed to improve the production efficiency and quality of engineered wood products like domestic CLT. Additionally, detailed studies on structural optimization, fire safety, and acoustic performance are essential for the successful adoption of mid- and high-rise timber construction in cities. These efforts will support the sustainable growth of the timber construction industry.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2024-0384-01).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

1..

Dodoo A, Gustavsson L, Sathre R. Lifecycle carbon implications of conventional and low-energy multi-storey timber building systems. Energy Build. 2014;82:194-210. .

2..

Buchanan AH, Levine SB. Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions. Environ Sci Policy. 1999;2:427-437. .

3..

Himes A, Busby G. Wood buildings as a climate solution. Dev Built Environ. 2020; 4:100030. .

4..

Singh T, Arpanaei A, Elustondo D, Wang Y, Stocchero A, West TAP, et al. Emerging technologies for the development of wood products towards extended carbon storage and CO2 capture. Carbon Capture Sci Technol. 2022;4:100057. .

5..

Morales-Beltran M, Engür P, Şişman ÖA, Aykar GN. Redesigning for disassembly and carbon footprint reduction: shifting from reinforced concrete to hybrid timber–steel multi-story building. Sustainability. 2023;15:7273. .

6..

Hafner A, Schäfer S. Comparative LCA study of different timber and mineral buildings and calculation method for substitution factors on building level. J Clean Prod. 2017;167:630-642. .

7..

Wiggins M, Lee HW, Echenagucia TM. Concurrent modeling of embodied carbon and construction costs for mass timber construction. In: Construction research congress 2024. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2024. pp. 165-174. .

8..

Salazar J, Meil J. Prospects for carbon-neutral housing: the influence of greater wood use on the carbon footprint of a single-family residence. J Clean Prod. 2009;17:1563-1571. .

9..

Kumar V, Lo Ricco M, Bergman RD, Nepal P, Poudyal NC. Environmental impact assessment of mass timber, structural steel, and reinforced concrete buildings based on the 2021 international building code provisions. Build Environ. 2024;251:111195. .

10..

Andersen JH, Rasmussen NL, Ryberg MW. Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon. Energy Build. 2022;254:111604. .

11..

Gustavsson L, Nguyen T, Sathre R, Tettey UYA. Climate effects of forestry and substitution of concrete buildings and fossil energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;136:110435. .

12..

Geng A, Yang H, Chen J, Hong Y. Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation. For Policy Econ. 2017;85:192-200. .

13..

Jeong T, Chang Y, Lee I, Ma Y, Jeong H, Jo Y. Analysis of domestic production status and import & distribution of construction timber products for the last 3 years according to THE WOOD USE SURVEY: from the perspective of increasing carbon storage. In: Proceedings of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 2023; Jeonju, Korea. p. 109.

14..

Lehmann S. Low carbon construction systems using prefabricated engineered solid wood panels for urban infill to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sustain Cities Soc. 2013;6:57-67. .

15..

Emre Ilgın H, Karjalainen M. Tallest timber buildings: main architectural and structural design considerations. In: Du G, Zhou Z, editors. Wood industry - past, present and future outlook. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2023. .

16..

Zhong Z, Gou Z. Adopting cross-laminated timber in architectural design to reduce embodied carbon emission in China based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Build Res Inf. 2023;51:834-852. .

17..

Iovane G, Sandoli A, Marranzini D, Landolfo R, Prota A, Faggiano B. Timber based systems for the seismic and energetic retrofit of existing structures. Procedia Struct Integr. 2023;44:1870-1876. .

18..

Mao Y, Hu L, Ren ZJ. Engineered wood for a sustainable future. Matter. 2022;5: 1326-1329. .

19..

Ding Y, Pang Z, Lan K, Yao Y, Panzarasa G, Xu L, et al. Emerging engineered wood for building applications. Chem Rev. 2023;123:1843-1888. .

20..

Song YJ, Baek SY, Lee IH, Hong SI. Variations of moisture content in manufacturing CLT-concrete composite slab using wet construction method. BioResources. 2021; 16:372-386. .

21..

Orenuga OS, Adebisi O, Adediran I. Emerging trends in sustainable materials for green building constructions. Key Eng Mater. 2024;974:13-22. .

22..

Balasbaneh AT, Sher W, Yeoh D, Yasin MN. Economic and environmental life cycle perspectives on two engineered wood products: comparison of LVL and GLT construction materials. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30:26964-26981. .

23..

Sandanayake M, Lokuge W, Zhang G, Setunge S, Thushar Q. Greenhouse gas emissions during timber and concrete building construction: a scenario based comparative case study. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;38:91-97. .

24..

Hemmati M, Messadi T, Gu H, Seddelmeyer J, Hemmati M. Comparison of embodied carbon footprint of a mass timber building structure with a steel equivalent. Buildings. 2024;14:1276. .

25..

Abed J, Rayburg S, Rodwell J, Neave M. A review of the performance and benefits of mass timber as an alternative to concrete and steel for improving the sustainability of structures. Sustainability. 2022;14:5570. .

26..

Ramage MH, Burridge H, Busse-Wicher M, Fereday G, Reynolds T, Shah DU, et al. The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;68:333-359. .

27..

Schenk D, Amiri A. Life cycle energy analysis of residential wooden buildings versus concrete and steel buildings: a review. Front Built Environ. 2022;8:975071. .

28..

Younis A, Dodoo A. Comparative carbon-footprint analysis of residential buildings with different structural materials. Proc Int Struct Eng Constr. 2022;9:1-5. .

29..

Hegeir OA, Kvande T, Stamatopoulos H, Bohne RA. Comparative life cycle analysis of timber, steel and reinforced concrete portal frames: a theoretical study on a Norwegian industrial building. Buildings. 2022;12:573. .

30..

Younis A, Dodoo A. Cross-laminated timber for building construction: a life-cycle-assessment overview. J Build Eng. 2022;52:104482. .

31..

Duan Z. Impact of climate change on the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cross-laminated timber and reinforced concrete buildings in China. J Clean Prod. 2023;395:136446. .

32..

Dodoo A, Nguyen T, Dorn M, Olsson A, Bader TK. Exploring the synergy between structural engineering design solutions and life cycle carbon footprint of cross-laminated timber in multi-storey buildings. Wood Mater Sci Eng. 2022;17:30-42. .

33..

Al-Hunaity SA, Karki D, Far H. Shear connection performance of cold-formed steel and plywood composite flooring systems: experimental and numerical investigation. Structures. 2023;48:901-917. .

34..

Gustavsson L, Haus S, Lundblad M, Lundström A, Ortiz CA, Sathre R, et al. Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;67:612-624. .

35..

Al-Radhi Y, Roy K, Liang H, Ghosh K, Clifton GC, Lim JB. Thermal performance of different construction materials used in New Zealand dwellings comparatively to international practice: a systematic literature review. J Build Eng. 2023;72:106346. .

36..

Petrović B, Eriksson O, Zhang X. Carbon assessment of a wooden single-family building: a novel deep green design and elaborating on assessment parameters. Build Environ. 2023;233:110093. .

37..

Duan Z, Huang Q, Sun Q, Zhang Q. Comparative life cycle assessment of a reinforced concrete residential building with equivalent cross laminated timber alternatives in China. J Build Eng. 2022;62:105357. .

38..

Lukić I, Premrov M, Passer A, Žegarac Leskovar V. Embodied energy and GHG emissions of residential multi-storey timber buildings by height: a case with structural connectors and mechanical fasteners. Energy Build. 2021;252:111387. .

39..

Hwang IC, Kim KU, Baek JR, Son WI. Long-term strategy and sectoral approaches of Seoul for achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Seoul, Korea: The Seoul Institute; 2020.

40..

Jeong JG. Carbon neutrality and future strategies on wood industries. In: Proceedings of the Korean Wood Science and Technology; 2021; online conference. p. 9.

41..

Im YS. Current conditions and future strategies on wood industries in Korea. In: Proceedings of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 2020; online conference. p. 11.

42..

Kang HM, Choi SI, Sato N. Study on trends and characteristics of timber supply and demand in Korea. Fac Agric Kyushu Univ. 2015;60:543-552. .

43..

Kang S. Wood industry status and wood business of KOFPI. In: Proceedings of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 2021; online conference. p. 4.

44..

Imamura FBT, Chen Y, Deng L, Chui YH. Moisture and mould growth risk of cross-laminated timber basement walls: laboratory and field investigation. Constr Build Mater. 2024;428:136150. .

45..

Askar MK, Al-Kamaki Y, Ferhadi R, Majeed HK. Cracks in concrete structures causes and treatments: a review. J Duhok Univ. 2023;26:148-165. .

46..

Tettey UYA, Dodoo A, Gustavsson L. Effect of different frame materials on the primary energy use of a multi storey residential building in a life cycle perspective. Energy Build. 2019;185:259-271. .

47..

John S, Nebel B, Perez N, Buchanan A. Environmental impacts of multi-storey buildings using different construction materials. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering; 2009. Research Report 2008-02.

48..

Ashby MF, Bréchet YJM. Designing hybrid materials. Acta Mater. 2003;51:5801-5821. .

49..

Vairagade VS, Dhale SA. Hybrid fibre reinforced concrete: a state of the art review. Hybrid Adv. 2023;3:100035. .

50..

Banthia N, Gupta R. Hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HyFRC): fiber synergy in high strength matrices. Mater Struct. 2004;37:707-716. .

51..

Schmidt EL, Riggio M, Barbosa AR, Mugabo I. Environmental response of a CLT floor panel: lessons for moisture management and monitoring of mass timber buildings. Build Environ. 2019;148:609-622. .

52..

Shirmohammadi M, Leggate W, Redman A. Effects of moisture ingress and egress on the performance and service life of mass timber products in buildings: a review. Constr Build Mater. 2021;290:123176. .

53..

Dietsch P, Franke S, Franke B, Gamper A, Winter S. Methods to determine wood moisture content and their applicability in monitoring concepts. J Civ Struct Health Monit. 2015;5:115-127. .

54..

Asdrubali F, Ferracuti B, Lombardi L, Guattari C, Evangelisti L, Grazieschi G. A review of structural, thermo-physical, acoustical, and environmental properties of wooden materials for building applications. Build Environ. 2017;114:307-332. .

55..

Lowden LA, Hull TR. Flammability behaviour of wood and a review of the methods for its reduction. Fire Sci Rev. 2013;2:4. .

56..

Paret TF, Searer GR, Cobeen KE, Kristie RJ. Strengths and weaknesses of wood-framed structures. In: Lynn AC, editor. AEI 2011. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2011. pp. 291-298. .

57..

Mariappan T. Recent developments of intumescent fire protection coatings for structural steel: a review. J Fire Sci. 2016;34:120-163. .

58..

Lucherini A, Maluk C. Intumescent coatings used for the fire-safe design of steel structures: a review. J Constr Steel Res. 2019;162:105712. .

59..

Stewart MG, Bastidas-Arteaga E. Corrosion of concrete and steel structures in a changing climate. In: Bastidas-Arteaga E, Stewar MG, editors. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 99-125. .

60..

Chau CK, Hui WK, Ng WY, Powell G. Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2012;61:22-34. .

61..

Xiao J, Wang C, Ding T, Akbarnezhad A. A recycled aggregate concrete high-rise building: structural performance and embodied carbon footprint. J Clean Prod. 2018;199:868-881. .

62..

Brimblecombe P, Richards J. Moisture as a driver of long-term threats to timber heritage—part II: risks imposed on structures at local sites. Heritage. 2022;5:2966-2986. .

63..

Das N, Shrestha R. Effect of moisture on the interface of timber and externally bonded fibre reinforced polymers: a review paper. Stavební Obzor Civ Eng J. 2019;28:566-575. .

64..

Shabani A, Kioumarsi M, Plevris V, Stamatopoulos H. Structural vulnerability assessment of heritage timber buildings: a methodological proposal. Forests. 2020;11:881. .

65..

Amran M, Fediuk R, Murali G, Vatin N, Al-Fakih A. Sound-absorbing acoustic concretes: a review. Sustainability. 2021;13:10712. .

66..

Tie TS, Mo KH, Putra A, Loo SC, Johnson Alengaram U, Ling TC. Sound absorption performance of modified concrete: a review. J Build Eng. 2020;30:101219. .

67..

Zhou J, Fang X, Yao Z. Mechanical behavior of a steel tube-confined high-strength concrete shear wall under combined tensile and shear loading. Eng Struct. 2018;171:673-685. .

68..

Habert G, Miller SA, John VM, Provis JL, Favier A, Horvath A, et al. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2020;1:559-573. .

69..

Kmbeam. Construction cases [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.kmbeam.co.kr/

70..

Huin. Huin product [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: http://www.huin.kr/

71..

HCwood. Korea’s highest level of structural laminated material production technology [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.hcwood.co.kr/

72..

SYwood. Korea has the best wood experts [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: http://www.sywood.co.kr/

73..

DHwood. Daeheung Sawmill [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://dhwood.co.kr/

74..

National Forestry Cooperatives Federation [NFCF]. Your dreams and future [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: http://eng.nfcf.or.kr/

75..

Sungchang Enterprise. Connecting people with nature [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: http://www.sce.kr/en/

76..

SUN & L. Lifestyle level up [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://sunandl.com/

77..

Eagon Industrial. Business areas [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.eagon.com/

78..

Dongwha. Wood panel [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://m.dongwha.com/

79..

Korea Forest Service. Market survey of timber products [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://winz.forest.go.kr/usr/inf/tmbrUsFfnsr.do

80..

Namyang Construction. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: http://www.namyang.co.kr/

81..

Daehan Materials. Daehan metal engineering [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: http://daehan-metal.com/

82..

KCC. KCC, a global applied materials chemical company [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.kccworld.co.kr/

83..

Hyundai Construction. Hyundai E&C [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.hdec.kr/

84..

Megatie. WoodnHome [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. https://woodnhome.com/category/%EB%A9%94%EA%B0%80%ED%83%80%EC%9D%B4/125/

85..

LG Hausys. Vision [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.lxhausys.co.kr/

86..

Stora Enso. Our offering [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.storaenso.com/en/

87..

Binderholz. A renewable raw material. Smart and varied solutions made from solid wood [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.binderholz.com/en-us/

88..

KLH. Made for building: built for living [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.klh.at/en/

89..

Hasslacher Norica Timber. Highest standards [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.hasslacher.com/en/from-wood-to-wonders

90..

Boise Cascade. Recent news [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.bc.com/

91..

Carter Holt Harvey. Welcome to Carter Holt Harvey [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://chh.com/

92..

Weyerhaeuser. WEYERHAEUSER to release fourth quarter results on January 30 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.weyerhaeuser.com/

93..

Norbord (West Fraser). West Fraser completes acquisition of Norbord [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.westfraser.com/investors/news/news-releases/west-fraser-completes-acquisition-norbord

94..

Kronospan. Welcome to Kronospan! [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://kronospan.com/

95..

Egger. The Decorative Collection 24+ for furniture and interior design [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.egger.com/

96..

UPM Plywood. Learn more about our products [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.upm.com/businesses/upm-plywood/

97..

Greenply. Green vision [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.greenply.com/

98..

Georgia-Pacific. At work in your world [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.gp.com/

99..

Sonae Arauco. What happens when a wooden desk reaches the end of its life? [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.sonaearauco.com/

100..

Swiss Krono. Meet us at BAU 2025 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.swisskrono.com/global-en/

101..

Holcim. What we do [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.holcim.com/

102..

CEMEX. Key figures [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.cemex.com/

103..

HeidelbergCement. evoZero®: the world’s first carbon captured net-zero cement [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.heidelbergmate rials.com/en

104..

Sika. Sika Korea [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://kor.sika.com/

105..

GCP Applied Technologies. Building the world better [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://gcpat.com/en

106..

Carlisle. Vision 2030 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.carlisle.com/

107..

Rothoblaas. Projects and contests [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.rothoblaas.com

108..

Simpson Strong-Tie. Introducing the Quik Drive® Project Pro screw driving tool. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.strongtie.com/

109..

Nippon Steel. Pick up [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. https://www.nippon steel.com/

110..

HILTI. SPEC2SITE [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.hilti.co.kr/

111..

Sherpa. Our product range: wood connectors [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.sherpa-connector.com/en/products/wood-connector

112..

USG corperation. The best tool you can have is a partner you can trust [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. https://www.usg.com/content/usgcom/en.html

113..

Henkel. Henkel’s business divisions [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.henkel.co.kr/

114..

3M. 3M unveils new name for Spinoff Healthcare Company [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.3m.co.kr/3M/ko_KR/company-kr/

115..

Rockwool. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.rockwool.com/group/

116..

Owens Corning. Explore more [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.owenscorning.com/en-us

117..

Knauf Insulation. Smart insulation solutions and services for a better world [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.knaufinsulation.com/

118..

CTBUH. Tallest mass timber buildings. The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.ctbuh.org/mass-timber-buildings

119..

Thornton Tomasetti. Ascent project [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.thorntontomasetti.com/project/ascent

120..

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Statistics on Building Permission, Commencement and Completion Works [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://stat.molit.go.kr/portal/main/portalMain.do