Table 3. Control effect of fusarium wilt on tomato according to inoculation timing of EM
Inoculation timing | Treatment | Disease severity | Infected plant (%) | Control efficacy (%) |
Sawing stage | Bacillus subtilis S37-2 | 1.0 | 19.5 | 58.1b |
Pseudomonas sp. GHR1-1 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 94.6a |
S37-2+GHR1-1 | 0.3 | 6.0 | 87.1a |
TSB | 1.1 | 22.0 | 52.7b |
Biological agent 2 | 2.3 | 45.6 | 1.8c |
Tab water | 2.3 | 46.5 | - |
Two-leaf stage | Bacillus subtilis S37-2 | 1.3 | 26.5 | 55.8b |
Pseudomonas sp. GHR1-1 | 1.2 | 24.0 | 60.0b |
S37-2+GHR1-1 | 0.9 | 17.5 | 70.8a |
TSB | 2.1 | 41.5 | 30.8c |
Biological agent 2 | 3.3 | 65.5 | - |
Tab water | 3.0 | 60.0 | - |